Fantasies J ust about everyone has had some sort of sexual fantasy.
No one — except the old, the sick, the handicapped — has ever been exempt from leading a productive life. In primitive societies, the good man hunted for the sustenance of the entire tribe and the good woman bore and reared children to ensure the survival of their kind.
In modern culture, the roles have changed in superficial ways, but until recently have remained essentially the same. Good citizens led productive lives and brought children into the world to replenish the community with virtue. Thieves and embezzlers were Psychology on homosexuality because they actively preyed on those who were honest and diligent.
Rakes and homosexuals were sexually selfish and irresponsible, not only because they were self-indulgent, but also because they saw sexuality as divorced from the responsibilities of parenthood. Quite apart from Biblical injunctions, homosexuals have been considered non-productive and hence inimical to the well-being and even the survival of the community.
In addition, they have been regarded as dangerous, because they preyed on the young and perverted them from normal, healthy, productive lives. In their selfish preoccupation with genital pleasure, they sought to rebel against the natural order of human life itself — the mutual responsibility of one for all that forms the basis of the social contract.
Now that many in our society have cast aside these ancient norms, we see the old warnings coming true. Social-Psychiatric Theory Traditional social-psychiatric theory argues that productive people will enjoy life, feel good about themselves, earn the respect of friends and co-workers, and feel connected with their families and society.
The non-productive will also have personalities shaped by their character and experience, namely, their worthless or counter-productive activities and life choices. They are expected to feel dissatisfied with life and themselves, be stung from social scorn, and seek excessive distraction through amusements, risk-taking, drugs, sex, etc.
They will feel angry at and at odds with their family and society, even while blaming them for their problems.
In reaction, traditional theory holds that rebels will mock those who are productive, even as they envy and resent them.
Besides the preoccupation by homosexuals with sex, traditionalist psychiatrists have catalogued a higher incidence of personality characteristics suggesting psychological disturbance and an inability to interact successfully with others.
Edmond Bergler 1who treated over a thousand homosexuals, concluded that gays tended to: The Psychological Question Are homosexuals troubled today because society unreasonably discriminates against them or are they more frequently pathological and distressed due to a psychology shaped by their choices and experience?
Furthermore, discrimination against those with homosexual inclinations, like discrimination against the able-bodied who refuse to work, is both necessary for the greater good of society and the individual himself. In fact, such discrimination is an attempt to prevent persons tempted by homosexuality from suffering the pathologies it induces.
The Reverse Socialization of Homosexuality Becoming a homosexual involves a tremendous amount of reverse socialization.
Almost every child is taught to avoid feces.
Yet most homosexuals eventually learn to immerse themselves in feces. Past surveys suggest the following typical sequential development of gay activity. The median age for gays when their genitals are first manipulated by another male is This conclusion is strongly supported by the data.
These findings support a previously observed, inverse relationship between psychosocial problems and the age of acquiring a homosexual identity. All generated results suggesting greater social disruption by gays. In the Kinsey survey, general prison inmates excluding those incarcerated for sexual offenses were over 4 times more apt to have extensive homosexual experience than his control group.
Bell and Weinberg 9 contrasted gays with heterosexuals and found more instability psychiatric, marital and more criminality among gays. Cameron and Ross 10 questionnaired 2, randomly-obtained respondents and reported that heterosexuals evidenced more social cohesion numbers and kinds of intimate relationshipsless self-destructive behavior smoking, drug use, suicide attemptsand less endangerment of others via driving habits, deliberate killing.The Construction of Homosexuality [David F.
Greenberg] on ashio-midori.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. At various times, homosexuality has been considered the noblest of loves, a horrible sin, a psychological condition or grounds for torture and execution.
Greenberg's careful. This is a really great book, entertaining and readable, yet also informative and educational. It discusses both the personal history of King James (of the King James Bible fame) and public perception of homosexuality during 16th and 17th Century England.
Homosexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between members of the same sex or ashio-midori.com a sexual orientation, homosexuality is "an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions" to people of the same ashio-midori.com "also refers to a person's sense of identity based on those attractions, related behaviors, and membership in a community of others who.
JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.
It is a well-documented fact that many many homosexuals were sexually abused when young. (This paper will conclude with a list of some books which support that statement.).
Homosexuality is no longer considered a form of mental illness by mainstream psychologists and psychiatrists.